|
Overhead Press ~ With the conventional overhead press
a barbell is lifted with speed from the shoulders directly overhead
putting stress on the rotator cuff that often results in injury.
One local trainer of note stated on TV that this exercise should
be avoided. With the MedX overhead press there is far less
stress on the rotator cuff, as the machine movement follows a gentle
arc in sync with the natural arcing movement of the arms when raised
overhead.
One of our trainers, Kyle Kloor,
had shoulder operations on each of his shoulders because of injuries
from performing the standard overhead press. Kyle and
other clients who have sustained permanent injuries performing the
standard overhead have experienced no problems with the MedX overhead
press using Ultimate Fitness's high intensity low impact system.
Injuries sustained in our youth
will come back to haunt us in the form of arthritis or restricted range
of motion when we are older. The best preventative is to be as strong
as possible now and not wait until we are older and the damage is
irreversible. This does not require hours in the gym. In fact too much
time in the gym can lead to overuse injuries such as those experienced
by Kyle.
HOME
Low back pain ~
Treating
back pain is a $40 billion a year industry. About 80 percent of the
people in this country, at one time or another, will suffer from acute
bouts of lower back pain; pain that comes and goes for no apparent
reason. If care is not taken these acute cases can become chronic
and more severe.
The gradual
weakness and loss of flexibility that comes with age leaves us vulnerable
to lower back injuries. In this compromised state we become less
active, weight gain often results further compounding the problem.
Often we overcompensate putting more strain on other parts of the body
and creating move problems. Reduced movement of the lumbar region
results in less hydration of the discs and even greater likelihood of
injury. Movement of the lower back keeps the discs healthy. This is
accomplished through proper exercise.
If
your back deteriorates beyond a certain point you will not be able
to exercise the back without the risk of injury. The
problem is finding safe effective way to exercise the back.
In 1988 Arthur Jones founded MedX Sports Medical Industries.
By 1993 alone he had spend 83 million on research developing an
exercise machine to effectively work the muscles of the lower back.
Breakthrough MedX technology produced the lumbar exercise machine
featuring a patented pelvic restraint system allows movement of
the lumbar region while the hips are locked. The means the
spinal muscles alone must lift the weight . a first.
One of our
trainers at Ultimate Fitness, Stephanie Nee, suffered from three
herniated discs. She had been told by two different doctors that she
would require surgery. She couldn.t do everyday household activities
involving bending or even lifting light objects. Since she began
exercising her low back at Ultimate Fitness her pain has completely
disappeared. Others have had
similar results.
Specific
intense exercise of the lower back results in a back that is stronger,
more limber and less prone to
injury. Short, infrequent sessions of low
back exercise are all that is needed to strengthen and maintain a strong
healthy back. We feel it is better to take steps now to avoid back
injury rather than wait until injuries occur. For more information: MedX
back pain results
HOME
Osteoporosis ~
As we age we lose muscle, strength, bone density, and balance.
Falls inevitably occur, hips break and a severely compromised
quality of life and a shorter life results. In 1982 Arthur
Jones, the founder of MedX, commissioned a study to see if
strength training could reverse osteoporosis in elderly women.
A high incident of injury resulted from performing exercise at the
conventional speed of movement; they slowed the repetitions
down, the injuries stopped and the subjects' bone intensity
increased.
Research at MedX has resulted in unmatched medical rehab
equipment and important advances in exercise science showing the
importance of strength training. for maintaining good
health.
One study1 using the MedX lumbar machine showed that
strength training was effective in increasing back extensor
strength, reducing the number of vertebral compression
fractures and increasing bone mineral density.
Another study2 using MedX equipment showed that high-intensity
training was successful for improving bone mineral density of the
femoral neck in healthy elderly subject.
With Ultimate Fitness's high intensity low impact protocol using
MedX equipment. We have clients who have used our system to
recover from hip replacements, knee replacements and reverse
the effects of osteoporosis. Twenty-five minutes a week,
three to four times a month is all that is necessary to being as
strong as you possibly can be at any age. Is it worth
the effort of exercising about 15 to 18 hours a year now to
avoid serious life compromising conditions later on? We
think it is.
(1) Can strong back extensors prevent vertebral fractures in women
with osteoporosis?; Sinaki M, Wollan PC, Scott RW, Gelczer
RK. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo
Clinic Rochester, Minnesota 55905; USA. Mayo Clin Proc 1996
Oct;71(10):951-6
(2) Resistance exercise and bone turnover in elderly men and
women; Vincent KR; Braith RW Center for Exercise Science, College
of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida,
Gainesville, FL 32611; USA. Med Sci Sports Exerc
2002 Jan;34(1):17-23
HOME
According to one study high intensity strength training of the
type employed at Ultimate Fitness burned fat at a rate nine
times greater than the rate of an aerobic program.
Metabolism 1994 Jul;43(7):814-8
Impact of exercise
intensity on body fatness and skeletal muscle metabolism. by Trremblay A, Simoneau JA, Bouchard C.
Physical Activity
Sciences Laboratory, Laval University, Ste-Foy, Quebec,
Canada. The impact of two different modes of training on body
fatness and skeletal muscle metabolism was investigated in
young adults who were subjected to either a 20-week
endurance-training (ET) program (eight men and nine women) or
a 15-week high-intensity intermittent-training (HIIT) program
(five men and five women). The mean estimated total energy
cost of the ET program was 120.4 MJ, whereas the corresponding
value for the HIIT program was 57.9 MJ. Despite its lower
energy cost, the high-intensity intermittent-training program
induced a more pronounced reduction in subcutaneous adiposity
compared with the endurance training program. When
corrected for the energy cost of training, the decrease in the
sum of six subcutaneous skinfolds induced by the
high-intensity intermittent-training program was ninefold
greater than by the endurance-training program. Muscle
biopsies obtained in the vastus lateralis before and after
training showed that both training programs increased
similarly the level of the citric acid cycle enzymatic marker.
On the other hand, the activity of muscle glycolytic enzymes
was increased by the HIIT program, whereas a decrease was
observed following the ET program. The enhancing effect of
training on muscle 3-hydroxyacyl coenzyme A dehydrogenase (HADH)
enzyme activity, a marker of the activity of beta-oxidation,
was significantly greater after the HIIT program. In
conclusion, these results reinforce the notion that for a
given level of energy expenditure, vigorous exercise favors
negative energy and lipid balance to a greater extent than
exercise of low to moderate intensity. Moreover, the
metabolic adaptations taking place in the skeletal muscle in
response to the HIIT program appear to favor the process of
lipid oxidation. Note: The Ultimate Fitness
training program is a high-intensity intermittent-training
program (HIIT).
HOME
Type
II Diabetes ~ While diet and drugs are
important in controlling Type II diabetes, high intensity strength
training such as the program used at Ultimate Fitness can be an important
role as well. In a study published in the October 10th issue
of Diabetes Journal Care [http://www..diabetesportal.com/type2/exercise/pump.htm ]
the co-author stated:
"The
effects of the resistance training program were as great as those
typically seen with drugs for diabetes,"
Insulin helps blood sugar enter the body tissues that need blood
sugar to produce energy. A slower metabolism and
less activity without a corresponding adjustment in diet result
in higher blood sugar levels and consequent higher insulin levels.
Eventually the body can become insulin resistant; more and more
insulin is needed to control blood sugar levels. Type II diabetes
results when the pancreas doesn't produce enough insulin or the
body can't effectively use the insulin it does produce.
16
million Americans have diabetes with 1,700 new cases being
diagnosed everyday. 90% of the cases are Type II, which is
most
common in older individuals. Diabetes has been linked
to the development of a variety of diseases including heart
disease, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and neurological
disorders.
Skeletal
muscle accounts for 70% to 80% of removal of sugar from
the bloodstream. Research indicates that weight
training can increase glucose utilization in the body by as much
as 23 percent in four months. Also when people do strength
training, they feel fitter and are more likely to take part in
other activities.
After
the age of 30 adults lose about 5 pounds of muscle a decade and as
a result our metabolism slows. At Ultimate Fitness we
want to keep that muscle we had when we were younger and even add
additional muscle. Is it worth 30 minutes of your week to be
as strong as you can be, raise your metabolism, increase glucose
utilization and lessen the likelihood Type II diabetes? We
think it is.
HOME
A
recent study shows significant differences in strength
increases comparing the Superslow®®
protocol to the conventional protocol. In the study one
group exercised using the Superslow® protocol and the other
followed the recommendations of the American College of Sports
Medicine (ACSM). We have some of the data but we can.t give
specific details as the study is undergoing peer review and has
not yet been published. Over 16 weeks the Superslow®
group exercised an average of @ 3.5 hours of exercise, while the
ACSM group exercised an average of 35 hours of exercise.
The strength increases on the leg press for the both groups were
similar. On the row and chest press the Superslow® method
produced better results.
Those using Superslow® improved on the row exercise every week -
a 21% increase from week four to week 16 The ACSM
improvement on the row was only 5%, and 11 out 13 peaked or got
weaker before week 16 using the ACSM protocol.
Those using Superslow® improved on chest press every week -
a 25% increase from week four to week 16. The ACSM
improvement on the chest press was only 9%, and 8 out 13 peaked
or got weaker before week 16 using the ACSM protocol.
Our speculation on why the subjects using the ACSM approach
actually got weaker toward the end of the 16 weeks - without
adequate recovery one cannot expect to improve. Everybody got
stronger in the first couple of months of the study, but as the
weights got heavier and the demands were greater the body needed
more time to recover from exercise. At Ultimate Fitness exercises
are performed far less frequently than with other protocols, but
most clients show improvement each time they exercise. It is
not how much exercise you can withstand; it is how much is needed
to produce a result. Exercising more often will not give
you more results if you cannot recover from the workout, and it
can actually make you weaker. Some just stay at the same
level year after year and claim they are maintaining. It
does not have to be that way.
HOME
Biomarkers Of
Aging ~ Of
all the biomarkers of aging the most important is the loss of
strength. The number one reason the elderly are placed in nursing
homes is the loss of strength necessary to carry out everyday activities.
Many biomarkers such as the graying of hair, balding, and wrinkles
can be addressed cosmetically. Others can be addressed through
science such as by wearing glasses or a hearing aid. The exercise we do
at Ultimate Fitness is effective in addressing the biomarkers that
effect not only how young we look, but more importantly, how we
young we feel.
-
Muscle
mass decreases. As adults we lose about five
pounds of lean muscle each decade. Through proper
strength training you can get back much of the muscle you had in
your twenties and even add to it.
-
Base
Metabolic Rate (metabolism) decreases.
More muscle requires more calories. Stronger muscles are more
toned and this requires more calories. Stronger toned muscles
present a younger look.
-
Fat
increases as a percentage of body weight.
By increasing muscle mass, fat as a percentage is automatically
less, and this extra muscle requires more fat
burning calories.
-
Strength,
energy and speed of the body decreases.
Proper exercise at Ultimate Fitness will make you stronger, and
day to day activities will be less strenuous and be less taxing
energy-wise. Stronger muscles produce more force, more power,
and more speed.
-
Aerobic
Capacity. The Ultimate Fitness.s non-stop circuit training
method has a very significant cardiovascular effect and
increases both aerobic and anaerobic capacity.
-
Body
cells become resistant to insulin. Added muscles will lower
your blood sugar level and lessen the need for insulin.
-
LDL Cholesterol
("bad" cholesterol) increases, and HDL Cholesterol ("good"
cholesterol) falls. In one exercise study HDL cholesterol
doubled for subjects using the very same exercise protocol
employed by Ultimate Fitness.
-
Bone
mineral density decreases. Increase the demands on the
muscular-skeletal system, and as self-protection, the body
responds by maintaining stronger muscles and bones.
-
Loss of
flexibility. The medical grade MedX equipment we use at
Ultimate Fitness permits one to work the muscles through a range of motion not possible with other equipment and
thereby enhances flexibility.
-
Increased
susceptibility to sickness and injury. A stronger body is
less like to get injured and will have a stronger immune system.
While other
forms of exercise might improve a certain biomarker more
effectively . running to improve aerobic capacity or yoga to
improve flexibility . none address so many as effectively weight
training. No other form of exercise increases the most important
biomarker, strength, as effectively as weight training. Further,
no strength training program is safer or more efficient than the
program at Ultimate Fitness. You need not spend hours in the gym
to make a profound difference. Mickey Mantel once said, .If I
had known I was going to live this long I would have taken better
care of myself.. Is it worth spending 30 minutes three to four
times a month to slow the aging process? We think it is.
HOME
Higher Intensity of
Exercise Linked to Lower Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
Properly performed high intensity strength training has
been shown to reduce high blood pressure and lower HDL cholesterol.
Exercise in general has been linked to lower risk of coronary heart
disease. There are plenty of studies out there, and they are not all in
perfect agreement, but it appears that higher intensity exercise might
be more beneficial in lowering the risk of coronary heart disease. The
type exercise performed at Ultimate fitness is high intensity exercise
where the major muscle groups are worked to exhaustion with little rest
between each exercise. The results are a stronger, more flexible,
injury-resistant, higher calorie-burning skeletal-muscular system. With
minimal rest between exercises there is the additional benefit of
improved cardiovascular health. Combining the Ultimate Fitness workout
with additional cardiovascular exercise will be even more beneficial to
the heart. The exercise bikes and particularly the rowing machine are
effective tools for additional high intensity work and are available
every day to Ultimate Fitness clients at no additional charge. Ask your
trainer how best to use them. Below are some studies. The first study
employed a protocol of circuit strength training that was later
developed into the protocol presently used at Ultimate Fitness. The
study used Nautilus equipment. The patents for the Nautilus equipment
were later implemented in the design of the more advanced MedX
equipment, the type used at Ultimate Fitness. The studies:
Excerpted from: Project Total Conditioning,
Conducted at the United States Military Academy at West Point, NY. James
A. Peterson, Ph.D. Paper presented to the Pre-Montreal Olympic
Conference of the International Congress of Physical Activity Sciences,
Quebec City, Canada, and July 15, 1976
"In the present study, by maintaining the intensity of
the training at a high level, substantial improvement was achieved in
both the level of muscular fitness and the cardiovascular condition of
the experimental subjects. In addition to enabling the subjects to
accommodate more resistance in a shorter period of time, the level of
aerobic capacity of the experimental subjects was significantly
increased. These results are contrary to the traditional viewpoint that
weight training does not affect the cardiovascular efficiency of the
individual trainee. Obviously, however, the consequences of a
weight-training program are dependent upon the methods and equipment
used in the program. Utilizing the mechanical and design advantages of
Nautilus weight training equipment, a high intensity workout of
relatively short duration resulted in improvement in more than merely
the level of muscular fitness. Unfortunately, the misinformation and
speculation attendant to many traditional practices in weight training
have hampered the search for insight and clarification into the proper
ways to train and the benefits of such training. Hopefully, the results
of "Project Total Conditioning" provide, not only a partial solution to
many of the enigmas associated with weight training, but also the
impetus for additional scientific inquiry into this area."
Another excerpt from: Project Total Conditioning
-- James A. Peterson, Ph.D.
"Contrary to most commonly held beliefs on the subject of
strength training, the training also significantly improved the
cardiovascular condition of the subjects. By maintaining the intensity
of the workouts at a high level and by limiting the amount of rest
between exercises, the training resulted in improvements on each of 60
separate measures of cardiovascular fitness. Contrary to widespread
opinion, not only will a properly conducted strength training program
produce increases in muscular strength, but will also significantly
improve an individual's level of cardiovascular conditioning. The data
suggests that some of these cardiovascular benefits apparently cannot be
achieved by any other type of training."
Lee I-Min, Sesso
HD, Oguma Y, Paffenbarger RS. Relative intensity of physical activity
and risk of coronary heart disease. Circulation. 2003;107:1110-1116.
In this study researchers found that it is the intensity
(or effort) that matters. The study followed 7,337 men with an average
age of 66 years from 1988 to 1993. The main finding from this study is
that among older men, the higher a person.s perceived level of
intensity, the lower their risk of developing coronary heart disease.
The relative risk of coronary heart disease among men who perceived
their exercise exertion as moderate was 14% lower than those who rated
their exercise level as weak or less intense. Men who perceived their
exercise level as somewhat strong had a 31% lower risk compared to men
who perceived their exercise level as weak or less intense, while men
who perceived their workout as strong or more intense had a 28% lower
rate. Men who exercised at a higher perceived level of intensity had a
lower risk of coronary heart disease than those who exercised at a lower
relative perceived level of intensity even after the authors adjusted
for age, body mass index (BMI), cigarette smoking, prevalence of
hypertension,
diabetes mellitus, early parental mortality, alcohol intake, and diet.
Tanasescu M, Leitzmann MF, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB
(2002) Exercise type and intensity in relation to coronary heart
disease in men. Journal of the American Medical Association 288:
1994-2000.
In this study researchers assessed the amount, type, and
intensity of physical activity in relation to chronic heart disease (CHD)
among men. The study found that total physical activity, running, weight
training, and rowing were each inversely associated with risk of CHD. In
other words, the more active the man, the less likely he is to suffer
from heart disease. Men who ran for an hour or more per week had a 42
percent risk reduction compared with men who did not run. Men who
trained with weights for 30 minutes or more per week had a 23 percent
risk reduction compared with men who did not train with weights. Rowing
for an hour or more per week was associated with an 18 percent risk
reduction.
Average exercise intensity was associated with reduced CHD risk
independent of the total volume of physical activity. This means that
the more intense the exercise, the greater the benefits that follow for
your heart health . even if the activities only take place in short
bursts. Activities performed at moderate and high intensities were more
effective in lowering CHD risk than activities performed at low
intensity. The researchers concluded that increasing the intensity of
aerobic exercise from low to moderate, or from moderate to high, and
adding weight training to the exercise program were among the most
effective strategies to reduce the risk of CHD in men.
Excerpted from: Aerobic Versus Strength Training for
Risk factor Intervention in Middle-Aged Men at Risk for Coronary Heart
Disease, M.A. Smutok, C. Reece, P.F. Kokkinos, C. Farmer, P. Dawson,
R. Shulman, J. DeVane-Bell, J. Patterson, C. Charabogos, A. P. Goldberg,
and B.F. Hurley, University of Maryland.
"The results of this study suggest that strength training
and aerobic training have comparable effects on risk factors for
Coronary Heart Disease. In Summary, 20 weeks of Strength training had
the same effect as 20 weeks of Aerobic Training on risk factors for
Coronary Heart Disease."
Excerpted from: Circuit Weight Training in Cardiac
Patients, M. Kelemen, MD, FACC, K.J. Stewart, EdD, R. E. Gillian,
MD, C.K. Ewart, PhD., S.A. Valenti, MD, J.D. Manley, BS, M.D. Kelemen,
John Hopkins School of Medicine, Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore,
Maryland.
"Circuit weight training appears to be safe, and to
result in significant increases in aerobic endurance and musculoskeletal
strength compared with traditional exercise (aerobic only) used in
cardiac rehabilitation programs. In fact a control group of cardiac
patients engaged in only a walk/jog program did not improve."
HOME
Age, exercise may boost memory
(CNN) --"You're not getting
older, you're getting better." New research shows this
traditional compliment may be true when it comes to memory,
especially for someone who stays in shape.
Recent studies indicate that a simple exercise routine
helps put the brakes on memory loss. And one aspect of memory
automatically improves with age, according to a new book.
Like body, like mind
What you do to improve your physical health may actually go
to your head, according to Dr. Antonio Convit of the New York
University School of Medicine.
"We thought that we were born with a brain and that brain
degenerated as we aged until we died," he says. "Now we know
that there are many triggers that make parts of the brain
regenerate themselves."
One of those triggers may be linked to your fitness level.
"Cardiovascular exercise that's done over a longer period
of time will tend to reduce the amount of tissue you lose as
you age," says Stan Colcombe, a researcher at the University
of Illinois-Urbana.
That includes brain tissue, and losing less of it may mean
keeping more precious memories.
Colcombe was part of a team of researchers at the
University of Illinois who looked at MRI scans of people 55 or
older and discovered dramatic differences in their brains. The
people who were physically fit had gray matter in better
shape.
NYU's Convit found that losing weight can also improve
memory function.
"[Losing weight] will improve how you regulate your
glucose, and we have shown that improved glucose regulation is
associated with better memory."
Dealing with blood sugar poorly not only affects one's
ability to remember but also the size of one area of the
brain.
Convit found that individuals with poor glucose regulation
had a smaller hippocampus, the part of the brain dealing with
memory.
Bodybuilder Arnold Schwarzenegger may have benefited twice
from "total recall," but it doesn't take hours in the gym to
improve your memory.
Moderate cardiovascular exercise, such as a brisk 30-minute
walk a few times a week, should do the trick, according to the
University of Illinois-Urbana study.
Improve with no effort
Problems remembering names or appointments, while
unpleasant, means trouble with only a small part of your
memory, according to Dr. Barry Gordon of Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine.
"A much larger and more important kind of memory is the one
that does our thinking for us," said Gordon, author of the
book "Intelligent Memory."
"Intelligent memory" works in different parts of the brain
from the memory that recalls a spouse's birth date or a
friend's name. And intelligent memory grows with age.
Intelligent memory helps people figure things out faster
and sparks creativity. It does this by storing memories and
skills learned over time.
The brain then uses this knowledge to help it learn
automatically by itself. This makes it easier to understand
situations and solve problems very quickly -- sometimes even
subconsciously.
As you age, intelligent memory increases because it has
added a lot of data to a person's memory storage, Gordon says.
So, getting older may mean getting wiser.
"It won't guarantee it, but it's the only way to make it
happen," says Gordon. "Socrates said there are no boy
philosophers. You cannot become wiser without experience."
Unfortunately, intelligent memory doesn't help you remember
where you put your keys, says Gordon, but "it will teach you
to put your keys in the same place every time."
HOME
Sarcopenia, the term for age-related
muscle loss, is largely avoidable
By
SANDI DOUGHTON
Scripps Howard News Service
If
you're over the age of 30, there's something you ought to
know about your muscles: They're probably shrinking.
Once most adults pass the physical prime of their teens and
20s, they lose an average of 10 ounces of lean body mass a
year, mostly in the form of muscle tissue.
It's a process more insidious and crippling than osteoporosis,
but few people notice until they realize it's getting difficult
to climb the stairs or heft themselves off the sofa. Unchecked,
the gradual erosion of muscle strength is the major reason
elderly Americans are forced to move into nursing homes.
It wasn't until a few years ago that medical experts put a
name to the phenomenon: sarcopenia, derived from the Greek
words for vanishing flesh. In the mid-1990s, several labs
across the country launched the first major studies of the
subject.
Today, a new understanding of age related muscle loss is beginning
to emerge, along with some hopeful indications. Far from being
as unavoidable as gray hair and wrinkles, sarcopenia can be
reversed or slowed significantly by strength-training exercise.
While it's best to start exercising early, several studies
show it's never too late to regain some muscle strength.
"It's not an inevitable consequence of aging," said
exercise physiologist Michael Hewitt. "It's an inevitable
consequence of disuse."
Hewitt is director of health and healing for Canyon Ranch,
an exclusive health spa in the Tucson foothills where guests
pay upward of $5,000 a week to be pampered and coached in
healthy living.
But it doesn't take a trust fund or even a health club membership
to learn four simple exercises that can stave off the ravages
of sarcopenia, Hewitt said during a recent Seattle conference
on aging.
"It only takes five to eight minutes, twice a week,"
Hewitt said. "No one can say: I don't have time for that.'"
These strength-training exercise, or others like them, should
be a part of any fitness regimen, said Hewitt and other exercise
experts.
While many people focus their workouts on jogging, stair climbing
or other aerobic activities, that doesn't help counter the
gradual deterioration of muscle strength, said Larry Woodward,
occupational therapist for a YMCA.
"Since we don't work in the fields like we used to, we
don't go hunting, we're more sedentary; we need to exercise
those muscles," he said.
At the same time muscle begins vanishing from our bodies,
fat begins accumulating. Few people actually lose 10 ounces
of weight every year. Most adults gain about a pound a year
- nearly all in the form of fat, which masks the loss of lean
tissue.
"It's such a slight loss yearly that we just don't notice
it until 10 or 12 years have gone by," Woodward said.
"If you don't do something, it really sneaks up on you."
The higher the proportion of fat in your body, the lower your
metabolism, which exacerbates the problem of muscle loss by
making it more difficult to be active and shed fat, Hewitt
said.
Irwin Rosenberg coined the term "sarcopenia" and
leads the Human Nutrition Research Center on aging at Tufts
University in Boston, where many of the ongoing studies are
centered. In 1997, the National Institutes of Health began
a broad-based research program on the phenomenon, which can
be devastating to the elderly.
Not only does loss of muscle mass lead to frailty and helplessness,
it also contributes significantly to life threatening bone
breaks.
"The weakness that results in imbalance that results
in falling is a very important element, along with low bone
mass, in the high incidence of hip fractures," Rosenberg
said.
So far, studies show that even people in their 90s can improve
their muscle function through strength training exercise,
he said. And for people who begin exercising earlier, the
news is even better.
"If you take people that have maintained physical activity
from early on, and you compare them to ones that haven't,
at the age of 70 or 75 there's a striking difference,"
Rosenberg said.
"Not only do the ones who have been physically active
and have done resistance training have more muscles, but they
also have less fat in their muscles."
Often, people in their 30s and 40s are so busy with their
careers and families that they neglect their bodies, Woodward
said. It's not until they have an injury or get a warning
from their physician that they're jolted back into activity.
By then, their muscle loss can be significant. And while they
can make up some of the difference, it's harder.
"If you don't get started and stick with it, it only
gets tougher on your body," Woodward said.
Age does bring some inevitable, physical losses, Hewitt pointed
out. It's entirely possible for a fit 70-year-old to have
more muscle mass than she had at the age of 30. But it's not
possible for her to develop more muscle in old age than she
could have had in her 30s, had she been in tip-top shape.
Still, even a slight increase in muscle strength at any age
can significantly improve quality of life-- and stave off
the frailty that used to be considered a normal part of getting
old.
1:
Acta Physiol Scand. 1997 Dec;161(4):439-45.
Enzyme
adaptations of human skeletal muscle during bicycle short-sprint
training and detraining.
Linossier MT, Dormois D, Perier C, Frey J, Geyssant A, Denis
C.
Laboratoire de Physiologie, Faculte de Medecine Saint-Etienne,
France.
The effect of sprint training and detraining on supramaximal
performances was studied in relation to muscle enzyme adaptations
in eight students trained four times a week for 9 weeks on
a cycle ergometer. The subjects were tested for peak oxygen
uptake (VO2peak), maximal aerobic power (MAP) and maximal
short-term power output (Wmax) before and after training and
after 7 weeks of detraining. During these periods, biopsies
were taken from vastus lateralis muscle for the determination
of creatine kinase (CK), adenylate kinase (AK), glycogen phosphorylase
(PHOS), hexokinase (HK), phosphofructokinase (PFK), lactate
dehydrogenase (LDH) and its isozymes, 3-hydroxy-acyl-CoA dehydrogenase
(HAD) and citrate synthase (CS) activities. Training induced
large improvements in Wmax (28%) with slight increases (3%)
in VO2peak (P < 0.10). This was associated with a greater
glycolytic potential as shown by higher activities for PHOS
(9%), PFK (17%) and LDH (31%) after training, without changes
in CK and oxidative markers (CS and HAD). Detraining induced
significant decreases in VO2peak (4%), MAP (5%) and oxidative
markers (10-16%), while Wmax and the anaerobic potential were
maintained at a high level. This suggests a high level in
supramaximal power output as a result of a muscle glycogenolytic
and glycolytic adaptation. A long interruption in training
has negligible effects on short-sprint ability and muscle
anaerobic potential. On the other hand, a persistent training
stimulus is required to maintain high aerobic capacity and
muscle oxidative potential. This may contribute to a rapid
return to competitive fitness for sprinters and power athletes.
Publication Types:
a.. Clinical Trial
PMID: 9429650 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Exercise Recommendations for Chronic Fatigue Sufferers Spark Debate
Aug. 31, 2000 -- A study by British researchers suggests that exercising beyond the point of fatigue is one way for people who suffer from chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) to build strength and feel better. But this recommendation for exercise has sparked a debate among experts who treat CFS patients.
"This study suggests that those with chronic fatigue syndrome remain disabled because they don't get off the couch," says Richard Bruno, MD, who has conducted other research involving CFS. "The more fundamental question is: What caused their muscles to become so weak that they were forced to stay on the couch in the first place? Our research in polio survivors and CFS patients suggests that there is a central cause of fatigue in all chronic fatigue syndromes: damage to the nerves that activate the brain and allow the brain to activate the muscles."
The researchers in this new study compared 66 people with CFS, a disorder characterized by general lethargy and the inability to perform basic physical activities without feeling tired, to those without CFS but who did not exercise regularly. They found that people with the disorder had weaker leg muscles and more difficulty exercising than did those without CFS. The study is published in the September issue of the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.
The researchers suggest, however, that the muscle weakness in these CFS patients is due more to changes in the brain than in the muscles themselves.
But Bruno doesn't agree with this logic. "That's like having [a shrunken] muscle in a leg that's been in a cast for several weeks and saying that the reason it's harder to walk is because your brain has changed, not the muscle," he tells WebMD. Bruno is director of the Post-Polio Institute in Englewood, N.J., a facility that treats patients with CFS.
The study authors suggest that something called "graded exercise therapy" would help reverse the weakness and difficulty exercising that CFS patients experience.
But Ellen Goudsmit, PhD, editor of a London CFS publication for physicians, is critical of these exercise recommendations. Although she agrees that patients should attempt to do some type of activity, she tells WebMD that the question is, "How much and when to stop? With graded activity, you don't stop when you're fatigued. What is better is to do what you can, then stop. I'm recommending that CFS patients implement a pace-and-switch regimen -- that is, do what you can with one muscle group, then do something that requires different muscles."
Those who develop CFS, she adds, are more often than not "activity-prone people who go and go and crash and recover, then start feeling better, then crash again. We try to get them to rest before they are fatigued."
In an editorial on the subject that is published in the same medical journal, Russell Lane, MD, of the Imperial College School of Medicine in London, writes that inactivity may be an important factor in CFS. However, the findings of this study raise the possibility that some patients with CFS have a form of metabolic problem with their muscles.
"Whatever the mechanisms underlying fatigue," he notes, "exercise therapy is likely to become ... increasingly important ... particularly in the management of chronic fatigue syndromes."
May 18, 2006 The NYT
Balancing Painful Swelling With a Desire to Exercise
FOR almost 20 years, the prevailing wisdom among most doctors has been that breast cancer survivors at risk of contracting lymphedema — a debilitating, irreversible swelling of one or both arms — should avoid most upper-body exercise or lifting anything heavier than five pounds. For many women, the stern warnings meant they could not shop for groceries or even carry their children. Running and walking were safe, but anything that taxed the arms was considered dangerous.
Women living with lymphedema received the same advice because of the concern that stressing their upper bodies would exacerbate their swelling, pain and stiffness.
But a study at the University of Minnesota that was released this week contradicts decades of restrictions. It found that slow, progressive weight training did not increase the onset of lymphedema in breast cancer survivors who had had lymph nodes removed, nor did it worsen the symptoms of longtime sufferers.
"While current clinical guidelines say that this type of exercise may be harmful, our research indicates that it is indeed safe," said Kathryn Schmitz, an author of the study and an assistant professor in epidemiology at the Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania. "More research is needed to know whether exercise prevents lymphedema, but there are physiologic reasons to believe that it might."
The study, the largest and longest randomized one to date to examine how upper-body exercise affects breast cancer survivors at risk of contracting lymphedema, was published online Monday in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
The exercise group only increased how much they hoisted with their arms in the smallest increments possible. After six months of twice-weekly workouts, the 23 weight lifters found no difference in arm circumference and reported fewer symptoms than the 22 women in the control group.
"Doctors aren't telling women not to lift anything because they want to hold women back," Dr. Schmitz said. "It is because lymphedema is one of the most poorly understood, hated and feared side effects of breast cancer treatment and they don't want to see women suffer. There is a need for caution, but we have thrown the baby out with the bath water."
For more than a decade, many breast cancer survivors who feared lymphedema limited themselves to five-pound weights. Others stopped lifting weights, choosing peace of mind over its potential benefits, such as preventing osteoporosis.
Of the roughly two million breast cancer survivors in the United States, 30 percent have lymphedema, estimated Dr. Joseph Feldman, the medical director of the Lymphedema Treatment Center at Evanston Northwestern Healthcare in Evanston, Ill.
Research has only begun to confirm why some women develop the condition. Though it hasn't been proven, most experts agree that women who are overweight or who have had radiation treatments are more at risk. They also suspect that infection or an arm injury might cause lymphedema, as might cabin pressure during air travel.
Cheryl Hogle, a teacher's aide from Minneapolis, felt discomfort in her right arm after a flight. The swelling got so bad that her fine motor skills were affected and eventually she struggled to open twist-cap bottles.
"People don't understand that it is chronic, painful," Ms. Hogle, 55, said. "And you can't hide a swollen arm." That didn't stop her from trying. She wore long-sleeve shirts when she jogged, unless it was too hot.
After participating in Dr. Schmitz's study, Ms. Hogle regained full use of her arm. And now that she has worked up to 60-pound lateral pull downs, she carries groceries that she would never have dared to lift before.
The study also validates what a handful of experts have practiced for years. Dr. Anne Rosenberg, a breast surgeon at Jefferson Medical College in Philadelphia, said that she has found that patients who vigorously exercise their upper bodies do not necessarily have adverse effects. "You have to do it cautiously," she said. "But you can do it."
Some women living with lymphedema have managed to do repetitive upper-body exercise in a way that doesn't aggravate their symptoms. Two years after her right arm became painfully swollen, Tracy Novak, a conference manager at West Virginia University in Morgantown, began to swim again with the approval of her physical therapist. Monitoring her arm for swelling, Ms. Novak started by doing the breaststroke for 12 laps and is now swimming 40 laps. Having bolstered her upper body, she is again able to help care for her boyfriend's daughter, who has severe cerebral palsy.
In the last decade, Linda Miller, the director of the Breast Cancer Physical Therapy Center in Philadelphia, has found that patients who strengthen their arms controlled their lymphedema symptoms better than those who didn't lift weights. "For years, I was spitting in the wind," said Ms. Miller, a physical therapist. "This study is going to rock the lymphedema world."
Some experts remain unconvinced. Although the Minnesota study was well-designed, Dr. Feldman of the Lymphedema Treatment Center cautioned that it only tracked women for six months. (Dr. Schmitz recently began a yearlong weight lifting study with 288 breast cancer survivors, half of whom have lymphedema.)
Dr. Feldman said he would not start advising his patients to use weights heavier than five pounds until a study spanning several years was done. Exercisers should also always use a compression sleeve and have a lymphedema expert take their baseline measurements, Dr. Feldman said. "Better to err on the side of caution."
On the other hand, advocates of progressive weight training have begun to suggest that exercise may even protect breast cancer survivors against lymphedema, which is a buildup of lymphatic fluid under the skin. When lymph nodes are removed during surgery to gauge the spread of cancer, there are fewer nodes to drain the protein-rich fluid, and swelling can occur. But given that exercise enhances the flow of lymphatic fluid and improves protein reabsorption, Dr. Schmitz hypothesized in her study that it may help "prevent lymphedema."
Dr. Carolyn Kaelin, a surgeon and the founding director of the Comprehensive Breast Health Center at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, offered this theory. Slow, progressive upper-body weight training places a gentle stress on the channels that lymphatic fluid flows through, causing them to dilate slightly. She theorizes that the circumference of the channel may actually enlarge over time to accommodate extra fluid when there is an injury or stress.
Because acute injury often triggers lymphedema, experts remain adamant that it is possible to overdo exercise. A doctor mistakenly told Elizabeth Warren, a personal trainer in Chicago who had had nodes removed, that she was so fit that she need not worry about straining her body. But in 1995 she experienced a burning sensation as well as swelling in her left arm after catching a 135-pound weight that a client dropped.
The ordeal left Ms. Warren, 55, so devastated that she stopped lifting even the lightest weights. Her weakened upper body eventually became a problem. "Because I lost muscle tone," she said, "I kept hurting my arm." She now practices slow, progressive weight lifting, but she laments not being advised to do so earlier*. If she had, Ms. Warren said, she might have avoided lymphedema or at least better managed her symptoms.
*Note this is the type of training employed at our training studio
HOME |
|
|